In Spirit and In Truth

Here's an interesting theory that Mike Adams, the Health Ranger of NaturalNews.com relays as he interviews residents and former BP workers in the Gulf. I have to tell ya, it doesn't sound so far fetched to me. I was wondering why BP doesn't have several plans in action. Why are they waiting to cap an oil spill AFTER "top kill" failed. Multitasking is something they expect their employees to do, yet they, with the billions they have, cannot come up with more than one plan at a time...hmmm.... ---------------------------start of article--------------------------- http://www.NaturalNews.com/028898_British_Petroleum_Gulf_Coast.html (NaturalNews) Today, I spent my time interviewing people on the Gulf Coast from Mississippi to Louisiana. Several of those interviews were conducted on camera, and you'll be seeing those videos as early as tomorrow here on NaturalNews. Interestingly, it turns out that a lot of the people living on the Gulf Coast have a history of workin

In light of my most recent response to a comment, I decided to write posts in regards to myths that are frequently mistaken for truth in today's climate of Christianity. Starting with the topic of modern translations. Some Christians from various denominations promote their preferred translation against the KJV. Their most popular argument against it is this: "The KJV is out-dated in language, therefore (insert point/argument here) and should not be studied out of".   While, I unabashedly prefer the KJV and use it in all my posts, I have never encouraged others to abandon their translations, only that they research it. The truth of the matter is, not all translations are created equal. The author/publisher of the translation should be researched. And if you have full trust in the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob to give you wisdom in choosing a translation, where can it be "wrong" to question the motives of a modern author/publisher, considering the capitalis

Response to KCTeenCenter on Translation vs. Paraphrase KCTeenCenter, Your desire to make things "clear" for readers who come to this blog, that the KJV is out-dated in language begs the question is the modern language better in communicating the doctrine and teaching of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, Son of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob? The short answer is no, one cannot assume because of an old language that the KJV does not and cannot offer the principles and teaching of Jesus Christ of Nazareth and His Gospel. Which leads to the second point: "KJV was written with the Church of England's beliefs in mind" Since it is not clarified in your point I have to assume within the context of your statement that you are insinuating the principles/doctrine of Christ has been compromised some how by the personalized beliefs of the Church of England. With all due respect to the history of the King James Version, where are these “beliefs” evident in the KJV th